Federal Judge Blocks Louisiana Ten Commandments Law, Calling It Coercive
Federal Judge Blocks Louisiana Ten Commandments Law, Calling It Coercive A federal judge in Baton Rouge has blocked Louisiana from requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every cla
Federal Judge Blocks Louisiana Ten Commandments Law, Calling It Coercive
A federal judge in Baton Rouge has blocked Louisiana from requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom, ruling that the mandate violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.
U.S. District Judge John W. deGravelles granted a preliminary injunction on November 12, 2024, in Roake v. Brumley, siding with parents and civil liberties groups who argued that the law, signed by Gov. Jeff Landry in June, amounted to unconstitutional religious coercion. The law, H.B. 71, required schools to post the Ten Commandments in "large, easily readable font" in every classroom, from kindergarten through public universities. Louisiana was the first state to pass such a requirement after the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, which reshaped Establishment Clause analysis.
DeGravelles, an appointee of President Barack Obama, found that the displays were "religious in nature" and that the law's stated secular purposes did not overcome its predominantly religious character. The ruling halts enforcement while the case proceeds. In a 2023 decision, Stone v. Graham, the Supreme Court struck down a similar Kentucky law, and the judge reasoned that the Louisiana statute shared the same constitutional defect.
The case has become a cultural flashpoint, with supporters framing the displays as a historical and moral foundation and opponents calling them a government endorsement of one faith. The ruling is likely to be appealed to the Fifth Circuit, which has leaned conservative on religious liberty questions, and the dispute could ultimately return to the Supreme Court as it reconsiders the boundaries of church-state separation.
Primary sources: Roake v. Brumley docket (CourtListener), preliminary injunction order
FedKite Wire
Keep Reading
D.C. Federal Judge Issues Opinion in Long-Running NACDL Records Fight With Bureau of Prisons
D.C. Federal Judge Issues Opinion in Long-Running NACDL Records Fight With Bureau of Prisons Judge Jia M. Cobb of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and

Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone: When a Tribe's Sovereignty Met a County's Subpoena
The 2003 Supreme Court decision that tested the boundaries of tribal sovereign immunity against state investigative power — argued by John D. Kirby.

Qualified Immunity: The Refinement That Never Happened — and Why It Still Matters
Three decades ago, a Cornell law student proposed a functional test for qualified immunity. The Supreme Court still hasn't adopted it. The lower courts are starting to.