Fifth Circuit Rejects Bid to Block Texas Election Map, Setting Up Fall Voting Rights Fight
Fifth Circuit Rejects Bid to Block Texas Election Map, Setting Up Fall Voting Rights Fight A federal appeals court has refused to pause a lower-court ruling that keeps a contested Texas redistricting
Fifth Circuit Rejects Bid to Block Texas Election Map, Setting Up Fall Voting Rights Fight
A federal appeals court has refused to pause a lower-court ruling that keeps a contested Texas redistricting plan in place for now, handing state officials a temporary win and civil rights plaintiffs another hurdle as they challenge the map under the Voting Rights Act.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied an emergency motion to stay a district court decision that had allowed Texas to use its current state legislative boundaries while litigation continues. The plaintiffs, who argue the map dilutes the voting strength of minority communities, had asked the appellate panel to block the plan ahead of upcoming elections. The Fifth Circuit's order means the map remains in effect as the case proceeds on the merits.
The dispute traces back to a challenge filed under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits voting practices that deny or abridge the right to vote on account of race. The district court had previously weighed the plaintiffs' evidence against the state's justifications and declined to enjoin the map at this stage. The Fifth Circuit's denial of a stay leaves that determination intact, though it does not resolve the underlying claims.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs have signaled they will press forward with discovery and expert analysis, arguing the boundaries were drawn in a way that fractures minority voting blocs across multiple districts. Texas has maintained that its map was lawfully enacted by the Legislature and complies with federal requirements. Neither side has issued a final ruling on the merits, and the case remains pending.
What to watch: whether the plaintiffs seek relief from the full Fifth Circuit or the Supreme Court, and how the district court schedules further proceedings as election deadlines approach.
Primary sources: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; 52 U.S.C. § 10301 (Voting Rights Act, Section 2)
FedKite Wire
Keep Reading
D.C. Federal Judge Issues Opinion in Long-Running NACDL Records Fight With Bureau of Prisons
D.C. Federal Judge Issues Opinion in Long-Running NACDL Records Fight With Bureau of Prisons Judge Jia M. Cobb of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone: When a Tribe's Sovereignty Met a County's Subpoena
The 2003 Supreme Court decision that tested the boundaries of tribal sovereign immunity against state investigative power — argued by John D. Kirby.
Qualified Immunity: The Refinement That Never Happened — and Why It Still Matters
Three decades ago, a Cornell law student proposed a functional test for qualified immunity. The Supreme Court still hasn't adopted it. The lower courts are starting to.